For Certified and Qualified Consultants Only
OUR GLOBAL AFFILIATES INCLUDE:
Mexico: www.peoplevalue.com.mx   /   India: www.chatur.com   /   Singapore/Hong Kong: www.distinctions-asia.com

THE BIG FIVE QUICK START

An Introduction to the Five-Factor Model of Personality for Human Resource Professionals

FIVE FACTOR MODEL BACKGROUND AND THEORY

For three decades, the training community has generally followed the assumptions of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator:

  • a four-dimension model
  • bimodal distribution of scores on each dimension
  • sixteen independent types
  • a primary function determined by Judger/Perceiver preference
  • grounding in Carol Jung’s personality theory

The new paradigm in personality is not a radical departure from the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, but does require a significant shift in thinking. The Five-Factor Model provides:

  • five dimensions of personality
  • normal distribution of scores on these dimensions
  • an emphasis on individual personality traits (not types)
  • preferences indicated by strength of score
  • model based on experience, not theory
THE SEARCH FOR THE BEST METAPHOR

Personality theories, or models, are metaphors for describing something indescribable--the human personality.  Some metaphors are more vague than others.  A PET brain scan is less vague than a paper and pencil questionnaire like the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.  The history of the study of personality has been one of minimizing vagueness.  

Language is the one ingredient that all theories have in common.  It is from language that we extract the source metaphor for describing personality.  This was the insight that propelled researchers in the 1950’s into the research that led to what we know today as the Five-Factor Model.





THE FIVE- FACTOR MODEL DEFINED

Each dimension in the Five-Factor Model is like a bucket holding a set of traits that tend to occur together.  The definitions of the five ‘super’ factors describe the common element among the traits, or sub-factors, within each bucket.  In 2001, the Center for Applied Cognitive Studies introduced the WorkPlace Big Five Profile, a 107-item survey with workplace-oriented language that measures five ‘super’ factors and 24 subtraits. The Five Factors are:

N - Need for Stability

E - Extraversion

O - Originality

A - Accommodation

C - Consolidation

Need for Stability (N)

Need for Stability refers to the degree to which a person responds to stress.  More resilient people tend to handle stressful workplace situations in a calm, steady, and secure way.  More reactive people tend to respond in an alert, concerned, attentive, or excitable way, thus creating the opportunity to experience more workplace stress than others.   

Need for Stability (N) Subtraits
4 N Subtraits RESILIENT REACTIVE
Sensitiveness At ease most of the time Frequently worries
Intensity Usually calm Quicker temper
Interpretation More optimistic Less optimistic
Rebound Time Rapidly rebounds from a crisis Takes longer to rebound from a crisis

 

Extraversion (E)

Extraversion refers to the degree to which a person can tolerate sensory stimulation from people and situations.  Those who score high on extraversion prefer being around other people and involved in many activities.  Low extraversion is characterized by preference to work alone and is typically described as serious, skeptical, quiet, and a private person.  

Extraversion (E) Subtraits
6 E Subtraits INTROVERT EXTRAVERT
Enthusiasm Holds down positive feelings Shows a lot of positive feelings
Sociability Prefers working alone Prefers working with others
Energy Mode Prefers being still or in one place Prefers to be physically active
Taking Charge Prefers being independent of others Enjoys the responsibility of leading others
Trust of Others Is skeptical of others Readily trusts others
Tact Tends to speak more directly Carefully selects the appropriate words

 

Originality (O)

Originality refers to the degree to which we are open to new experiences and new ways of doing things. Highly original people tend to have a variety of interests and like cutting edge technology as well as strategic ideas. Those low in originality tend to possess expert knowledge about a job, topic, or subject while possessing a down-to-earth, here-and-now view of the present. 

Originality (O) Subtraits
4 O Subtraits PRESERVER EXPLORER
Imagination Prefers implementing plans Prefers creating new plans
Complexity Prefers simplicity Prefers complexity
Change Maintains existing methods Readily accepts changes and innovations
Scope Is attentive to details Prefers a broad view and resists details

 

Accomodation (A)

Accommodation refers to the degree to which we defer to others.  High accommodation describes a person who tends to relate to others by being tolerant, agreeable and accepting of others. Low accommodation describes someone who tends to relate to others by being expressive, tough, guarded, persistent, competitive or aggressive.  Low accommodating people may come across to others as hostile, rude, self-centered, and not a team player.

Accommodation (A) Subtraits
5 A Subtraits CHALLENGER ADAPTER
Others' Needs More interested in self needs More interested in others’ needs
Agreement Welcomes engagement; aggressive; competitive Seeks harmony; yields under conflict; defers
Humility Wants acknowledgement Uncomfortable with acknowledgement; humble
Reserve Usually expresses opinions Keeps opinions to self

 

Consolidation (C)

Consolidation refers to the degree to which we push toward goals at work.   High consolidation refers to a person who tends to work towards goals in an industrious, disciplined, and dependable fashion.  Low consolidation refers to someone who tends to approach goals in a relaxed, spontaneous, and open-ended fashion.  Low consolidation people are usually capable of multi-tasking and being involved in many projects and goals at the same time.

Consolidation (C) Subtraits
5 C Subtraits FLEXIBLE FOCUSED
Perfectionism Low need to refine or polish Continual need to refine and polish
Organization Comfortable with little or no formal organization Well-organized; neat; tidy
Drive Satisfied with current achievement Craves more achievement
Concentration Shifts easily between tasks Prefers to complete tasks before shifting to others
Methodicalness Operates in a more spontaneous mode Develops plans for everything




Consensus in the Psychological Community

Up until twenty years ago, the personality research community was fragmented, with Freud, Erikson, Horney, Jung, Murray, Eysenck, and others all claiming the best model.  All were partially right, but only the Five-Factor Model has arms big enough to include them all.

What is different today versus twenty years ago is that there has been a clear trend towards embracing a single model-- the Five-Factor Model-- as the research paradigm to follow. But while unanimity among personality researchers is still beyond our grasp, one can sense the excitement among researchers in the academic literature:

  • The comprehensive analyses in Dutch have provided so far the strongest cross-language evidence for the Five-Factor Model. John, Angleitner, & Ostendorf (1988)
  • The past decade has witnessed a rapid convergence of views regarding the structure of the concepts of personality.  Digman (1990)
  • The major aim of this article has been to provide sufficient evidence to alleviate any qualms about the generality of the Five-Factor Model structure. Goldberg (1990)
  • We believe that the robustness of the Five-Factor Model provides a meaningful framework for formulating and testing hypotheses relating individual differences in personality to a wide range of criteria in personnel psychology, especially in the subfields of personnel selection, performance appraisal, and training and development.  Barrick & Mount (1991)
  • I again, anticipate more extensive use by tomorrow's practitioners of new generations of inventories, for example, the NEO Personality Inventory developed by Costa and McCrae (1988) for the assessment in healthy individuals of something akin to today's five basic dimensions of character and personality that have evolved empirically from a line of inquiry first suggested by Galton a century ago.  Matarazzo (1992)
  • The past decade has witnessed an electrifying burst of interest in the most fundamental problem of the field-- the search for a scientifically compelling taxonomy of personality traits. More importantly, the beginning of a consensus is emerging about the general framework of such a taxonomic representation.  Goldberg (1993)
  • Currently the most popular approach among psychologists for studying personality traits is the Five-Factor Model or Big Five dimensions of personality.    Scott Acton (2001)
  • There are a variety of different perspectives in the field of personality, including psychoanalytic and cognitive interpretations. However, the most commonly used and accepted is the Five-Factor descriptive model.    Piers Steel, Joseph Schmidt, and Jonas Shultz (2008)
  • The [Five-Factor] model is considered to be the most comprehensive empirical or data-driven enquiry into personality.    Wikipedia (2009)
What's Next

As fellow human resource professionals, the Center for Applied Cognitive Studies encourages you to study the Five-Factor Model.  The academic psychology community is now ahead of the human resource development community.  The Five-Factor Model is ideally suited for the following applications:

  • team building
  • selection
  • job analysis
  • training design
  • customer service
  • management and professional development
  • coaching and counseling
  • career development
  • leadership development
  • conflict management
Interested in learning more about the Five-Factor Model? Here’s how to get started:
  • Order The Owner’s Manual for Personality at Work. Contact us at 800-244-5555 to order.
  • Attend an annual conference. Meet company founders, network with Five-Factor Model practitioners, and learn the latest research findings and ongoing projects.
  • Attend a WorkPlace certification program, either in class or online, and become a certified consultant. See Programs section of the website.

Questions? info@centacs.com

ABOUT | SERVICES | PHILOSOPHY | RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT | PRODUCTS | CONTACT
©2010 CENTER FOR APPLIED COGNITIVE STUDIES         PRIVACY POLICY | TERMS OF USE | SITE MAP